On Jan 20, 2014 2:22 AM, "g" <geleem@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 01/19/2014 07:20 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> <>
>
>> IOW it *was* in plaintext. It did however also have a "Rich Text"
>> alternative part, which presumably is what violates the Guidelines
>
>
> if you look up from bottom, you will also see that it has;
>
> }>  --e89a8f646f8f93fa7504f051c062
> }>  Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
> }>  Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> which also violates  guidelines.

That would correspond to the alternative part, which I already mentioned.

poc