27 Dec
2006
27 Dec
'06
5:56 a.m.
jdow wrote:
Besides, WTF good is Bayes with image spam?
Actually, I find that SA's Bayesian engine is pretty good at spotting the random text they put in most image spam. With a few extra points for technical stuff, most of it goes directly to the spam folder, and the rest to the "unsure" folder with fairly high scores.
James.
--
E-mail: james@ | DON'T be put off by "horror stories" spread by others.
aprilcottage.co.uk | People who talk about death and serious injury are very
| rarely the ones who have actually suffered such things.
| -- Adrian Plass