On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 01:07:54PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 10/10/2016 12:49 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>Well, apparently the savings might not offset the price of the ammeter,
>but I suppose the advancement of knowledge always has a cost :-)
I remember back in the late '80s seeing a study that found that the
cost per hour of running a desktop (386 with a CRT monitor) was
about $.04/hr. Adjust that for inflation and you'll get a fairly
good first approximation of what the cost is now because while
modern monitors use less power, today's more powerful computers use
more, balancing things out to some extent.
I've missed the beginning of this thread, so I beg forgiveness should
this response be off-base.
To measure the power my computer uses, I use a Kill-a-Watt meter,
at last notice they were available from Amazon. The one I have was
something like 20 dollars, a few years ago. It continuously tells
me the wattage used. alternatively it can report several other measurements
as well (it isn't where I am, so I won't go out on a limb with a list
that may be wrong.)
You plug it into your outlet, then plug the computer into it. Press
the right button on the front to get the measurement you want.
It is reporting that my computer uses around 117 watts (plus or minus
a couple) when running FoldingAtHome on both a six-core AMD and the
Nvidia 750Ti GPU. without the FAH client it would probably be around
half that (I haven't done that measurement).
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under no circumstances will I ever purchase anything offered to me as
the result of an unsolicited e-mail message. Nor will I forward chain
letters, petitions, mass mailings, or virus warnings to large numbers
of others. This is my contribution to the survival of the online
community.
--Roger Ebert, December, 1996
----------------------------- The Boulder Pledge -----------------------------