tangentially following the thread.

But if i'm understanding. You have a somewhat "critical" piece of software, dealing with "Aerospace" components, that I gather are used for Aerospace related projects. Given that you mentioned "chain of custody" (supply channel) this implies some level of importance beyond the old used parts that are useless.... or the hobbyist markets.

If this is commercial, and the client/vendor in any way/shape/form interfaces with major operations in the space/aerospace industries, or the defence industry, and if your client is US based, you might want to have the guy sign waivers saying you are not responsible for anything related to this, and you might actually want to tell him/advise him to get someone else to run the system.

The industries I mentioned above, frown upon systems that aren't locked down/tight!

Your mileage might vary.

Good luck

On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 7:23 PM ToddAndMargo via users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:

On 2/23/25 5:36 AM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> I am surprised that your client's software has not complained of something assuming that it is still being maintained and interfaces with things beyond the computer.

The software on so poorly maintained that I consider is to
be not maintained.

Problem is that the software does something that is unique
and the customer needs the feature, which is tracking of all
the parts for aerospace. I forget what that is called,
but it is like "chain of custody".
--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue