On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 4:43 PM Philip Rhoades via users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
People,

A while ago I was in a hurry to start using F40 (Sway) and installed
Rawhide from a live usb to get started.

Everything went pretty well and I had minimal problems up until after
f40 was release.  However now, when I tried to do a:

   dnf system upgrade download --releasever=40

I get a lot of errors - trying to do "dnf --erase" the problem rpms ends
up making the problem worse.

You need to tell us what errors you encounter. Are they filesystem problems, 
package conflicts, etc.?

So, if I try to reinstall from the current f40 live usb - can I do that
without touching the backup subvolume? ie:

/dev/nvme0n1p3    btrfs   1,951,850,496     464,659,184   1,486,438,224 
  24% /
/dev/nvme0n1p3    btrfs   1,951,850,496     464,659,184   1,486,438,224 
  24% /backup

Unlike earlier filesystems, btrfs doesn't silently ignore bitrot.  Corrupt btrfs filesystems
are often a result of hardware faults. 

For decades I have just been using a separate partition for /home with
ext[2|3|4] and this was conveniently not touched if I did a custom
install to upgrade - I want to do something similar for this backup
subvolume.

I would never consider a btrfs subvolume a suitable location for a backup.  The btrfs
snapshots provide a way to go back in time after data are lost due to a software 
glitch or command-line typo.  Using a subvolume, when the drive fails, both the original 
and backups may be lost.   If a drive is close to failure,  a linux install often pushes 
it over the edge (due to amount of activity), so I like to make sure backups are good before
an upgrade or install.

--
George N. White III