Am Mo, den 10.01.2005 schrieb Johnathan Bailes um 22:34:
If I am missing something please let me know but I use this
conf on my own box.
I would never enable all these repos and took it as gentle gospel that
they were disabled by default for a damn good reason.
I have seen much worse example apt and yum confs where this was
certainly NOT the case and all kinds of interesting things were
enabled that really should not have.
Ok, what is my long-winded point? I thought this was a great example
conf because it did NOT enable freshrpms atrpms and dag by default
and posted examples of the judicious use of enablerepo for singular
apps the user might want.
thank you for your disagreeing reply. Really! Because it gives my
perception a new bias. So it seems that at least there are exceptions
from the rule I got so far, that the yum.conf from the FAQ page was
taken without thinking too much about it. You got me wrong - for your
case :) That's good - I have hope.
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | new address - new key: 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon kernel 2.6.9-1.6_FC2smp
Serendipity 23:05:22 up 19 days, 49 users, load average: 0.62, 0.57,