On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 21:35:14 +0100, Andy Green wrote:
Seems unusually consistent to me. Dag had the same understanding too:
And with that there is the jump back to May 31st, where I asked in this thread:
"?? Do you refer to Dag's not so friendly paragraph in his FAQ?"
Sorry, but unless you present actual solutions -- such as a concept on inter-repository collaboration/coordination/cooperation -- this is a dead end.
|>Yeah, as I wrote before (base+extras) is the new base. Again the effect |>is to pull packages from the RPMForge orbit into Extras, which because |>of its "enabled by default" feature and Fedora relationship is likely to |>become the uber-repo that you envisage. | | Which is a good thing.
High quality GPL'd packages coming out of Extras have to be a good thing for everybody. RPMForge getting packages sucked out of it does not sound like a good thing for most people.
How is your second sentence above meant to be understood?
|>It's encouraging that "Cooperation is possible" then... but this is new |>information to me. | | As long as you can't explain where your "cooperation is impossible" | theory comes from, I cannot comment on this. Then there's still the | question what kind of cooperation do you think of?
Lol...
Bad form unless you want to stop a serious discussion abruptly.
since you today noted that cooperation is possible, I am pleased to agree with you it is possible. But anyone reading your old document will not come away with that impression I think. Maybe you should update it with this case where cooperation is possible.
I realise you still don't [want to] understand what that old Wiki page tries to point out.
Anyway, I detect we are going around in circles and not moving forward, you are welcome to the last word.
Fine. How about you get to the gory details? Really, what changes do you want?