The bizarre thing is that pympress works on one machine, and not on the other one (both fedora 34 in the last update).
which pympress|xargs rpm -qf python3-pympress-1.7.0b1-1.noarch
pip list |grep pympress pympress 1.7.0b1
Is this good?
=========================================================================== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988 | | Room# D114A ===========================================================================
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2022 at 12:11 AM From: "Cameron Simpson" cs@cskk.id.au To: "Community support for Fedora users" users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: pympress
On 13Jun2022 15:07, Joe Zeff joe@zeff.us wrote:
On 6/13/22 13:51, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Defaulting to user installation because normal site-packages is not writeabl
That just means that you should have done this with root privs.
I certainly DID NOT want it done with root privileges. Gadzooks!
This should do a persoanl install of pympress for comparison and testing.
Patrick: does the local pympress run?
Cheers, Cameron Simpson cs@cskk.id.au _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure