Hi,
I'd concur with Athmane Madjoudj, you might have a bad
anti-aliasing
option picked for your system. And some fonts do that better than
others.
If you have the liberation fonts installed, they do a good job of
replacing the usual Windows-expected fonts, and freely. Your computer's
much more likely to substitute a good choice of font, rather than a bad
one, when you don't have the Windows font that the author wanted to use.
I do have the liberation fonts installed:
# rpm -qva|grep -i liberation
liberation-serif-fonts-1.06.0.20100721-1.fc13.noarch
liberation-sans-fonts-1.06.0.20100721-1.fc13.noarch
liberation-fonts-common-1.06.0.20100721-1.fc13.noarch
liberation-mono-fonts-1.06.0.20100721-1.fc13.noarch
I've also tried to change the anti-aliasing options to a few of the
others, but the page still mostly looks the same.
FWIW, I find it helpful that when an image is posted that the actual
link also be posted so that folks looking at it can compare what they
see on their system alongside of what the OP is seeing.
Yes, should have thought of this. This was really just an example --
for the most part, fonts in the browser look blurry.
Other ideas greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Alex