On 14 Mar 2025, at 14:55, lejeczek via users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:

On 11/03/2025 13:41, lejeczek via users wrote:

or is it?
Hi guys - do you know?
Is Chromium's playback hw-accelerated some other way, is it accelerated at all?

many thanks, L.

Nobody, really... no video platform users among Fedora?

There are on https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/ that is a lot more active than this list.

I expect you will get a response there,

Barry

I'm perplexed for when - say in Youtube - content/clips is VP9 encoded then Chromium seems okey & goes for "VaapiVideoDecoder" but when it comes to AV1 encoded content then "Dav1dVideoDecoder" gets selected - Firefox, but even more curiously Chromium from Flatpak, do use VAAPI for AV1.
Any thoughts/suggestions on how to resolved this "issue" much appreciated.
thanks, L.

--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue