5 Nov
2012
5 Nov
'12
12:21 p.m.
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 13:15:53 -0500, Tom Horsley horsley1953@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 09:56:42 -0800 Gordon Messmer wrote:
It's less work to simply disable NetworkManager, and less likely to cause a dependent package to fail.
Not when "disable" is apparently only a mild suggestion that has no actual effect :-). Apparently the word which actually means "disable" is "mask".
I run with NM disabled on systems where I am not using wireless and it seems to work fine.