Loren Lockwood wrote:
Good idea, Duncan. Actually I do have a spare partition which I
could
use exactly in that way. The only real reason I am using NTFS under W2K
is that it is apparently more stable than FAT32. I have had BIG
problems with FAT32 in the past (under W98SE).
I think that has more to do with Windows 98 than FAT32. When it's
stable, it's reasonably stable. When it isn't, you've got a real problem
trying to sort out what the problem is.
Note that despite the names, Windows 98 and Windows 2000 are *very*
different creatures. I have had no problems with FAT 32 on either
Windows 2000 or Linux.
James.
--
James Wilkinson | You will stop at nothing to reach your objective,
Exeter Devon UK | but only because your brakes are defective.
E-mail address: james |
@westexe.demon.co.uk |