Re: Open Office fails after upgrade to F24

[Stephen Davies]

On 28/11/16 15:32, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 11/28/16 12:22, Stephen Davies wrote:
> > If I run /usr/bin/soffice as root, it works and the Office menu appears.
> > If I do the same as myself (sh -x /usr/bin/soffice), I get:
> > SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING=1
> > export SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING
> >
> > ++ pwd
> > sd_cwd=/home/scldad
> > sd_res=/usr/bin/soffice
> > '[' -h /usr/bin/soffice ']'
> >
> > ++ dirname /usr/bin/soffice
> > cd /usr/bin
> >
> > ++ basename /usr/bin/soffice
> > sd_basename=soffice
> >
> > ++ ls -l soffice
> > ++ sed 's/.*soffice -> //g'
> > sd_res=/opt/openoffice4/program/soffice
> > '[' -h /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice ']'
> >
> > ++ dirname /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice
> > cd /opt/openoffice4/program
> >
> > ++ pwd
> > sd_prog=/opt/openoffice4/program
> > cd /home/scldad
> >
> > ++ basename /usr/bin/soffice
> > sd_binary=soffice.bin
> > sd_pagein_args=@pagein-common
> > /opt/openoffice4/program/pagein -L/opt/openoffice4/program @pagein-common
> > '[' -x /opt/openoffice4/program/javaldx ']'
> > case "`uname -s`" in
> >
> > ++ uname -s
> > ++ /opt/openoffice4/program/javaldx
> > -env:INIFILENAME=vnd.sun.star.pathname:/opt/openoffice4/program/redirectrc
> >
> > my_path=/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_71/jre/lib/amd64/client:/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_71/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads:/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_71/jre/lib/amd64
> > '[' -n
> >
> > /usr/java/jdk1.7.0_71/jre/lib/amd64/client:/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_71/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads:/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_71/jre/lib/amd64
> > ']'
> >
> > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_71/jre/lib/amd64/client:/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_71/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads:/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_71/jre/lib/amd64:/opt/LCS/bv103/doci:/opt/LCS/bv103/dm/lib
> > export LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> > unset XENVIRONMENT
> > '[' -f /etc/adabasrc ']'
> > trap 'kill -9 $!' TERM
> > wait 11722
> > /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice.bin
> > sd_ret=0
> > '[' 0 -eq 79 -o 0 -eq 81 ']'
> > exit 0
> >
> > Running soffice without sh -x gives absolutely nothing.
>
> Well, I would check the environment compared to root's.  I also find the reference to
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH suspect.
>
> Here is what I get.
>
> [egreshko@acer ~]$ sh -x /usr/bin/soffice
> LO_SAVE_LC_ALL=
> LC_ALL=C
> export LC_ALL
> SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING=1
> export SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING
>
> ++ pwd
> sd_cwd=/home/egreshko
> sd_res=/usr/bin/soffice
> '[' -h /usr/bin/soffice ']'
>
> ++ dirname /usr/bin/soffice
> cd /usr/bin
>
> ++ basename /usr/bin/soffice
> sd_basename=soffice
>
> ++ ls -l soffice
> ++ sed 's/.*soffice -> //g'
> sd_res=/usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/soffice
> '[' -h /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/soffice ']'
>
> ++ dirname /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/soffice
> cd /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program
>
> ++ pwd
> sd_prog=/usr/lib64/libreoffice/program
> cd /home/egreshko
> '[' -e /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/ooenv ']'
> GDBTRACECHECK=
> STRACECHECK=
> VALGRINDCHECK=
> RRCHECK=
> checks=
> EXTRAOPT=
> test -n ''
> test -n ''
> echo ''
> grep -q cc
> case "`uname -s`" in
>
> ++ uname -s
> LC_ALL=
> '[' -n '' ']'
> '[' -n '' -a -z '' ']'
> exec /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/oosplash

Looks as if you are running libreoffice rather than openoffice (from Apache).

I also suspected the LD_LIBRARY_PATH but the root version is the same.