On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> wrote:

Am 30.03.2013 22:07, schrieb Richard Vickery:

> I'm just offering my understanding of the cycles, Reindl. Perhaps I should have prefaced my contribution as such,
> but that is not grounds for calling it ZERO. Calling my contribution ZERO indicates that I took a class on
> understanding the development cycle, in which your ZERO would be self-directed, or directed at Red Hat or Fedora,
> because you didn't teach the concepts properly, but there is no such course, so why bash me when I am just here to
> contribute and learn what I can. Did I not start the piece with a suggestive beginning that I may be wrong and
> those like yourself with vastly superior knowledge would clear it up?

you REALLY install a random operating system without
any research of basics? if you act in the real world
this way you would not have a chance to survive

https://www.google.com/search?q=fedora+life+cycle
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle?rd=LifeCycle

In my world, those of political science and law, research is done in books or online reports where we know what to look for, and we have a pretty good knowledge of what the cases are that we're making; plus, we have librarians ready and willing to help find information. Excuse my ignorance, but I neither knew, nor heard anyone suggest, that I had to go grab information and insight from some webpage, the existence of which most contributors, at least in my place, are clueless of.