Can we at least cut out the ad-homs? They're useless as a rhetorical device, actual worse than useless, they're counter-productive. Calling people names will only steel themselves against your position, and other people will start to lose respect for your arguments.
And, your arguments are valid. Ever since I switched back to Fedora from Ubuntu, I hate the fact that I have to tweak my DE to hell and back before I can use it efficiently after every upgrade, I have to install a decent font, I have to go into gconf-editor to configure focus-follows-mouse, and any number of annoying manual steps just to get a desktop that rivals what Ubuntu gives me out of the box.
But the ad-hominems and bad rhetoric take away from your argument, not add to it.
Matt
Craig White <craigwhite <at> azapple.com> writes:
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 06:34 +0000, JB wrote:
You are largely irrelevant, somewhat absurd and probably best
ignored -
sorry, I tried. ...
But you are not sure ...
did I seem to equivocate somewhere? I don't think so. ...
Yes, you did.
You contradict yourself, sign of uncertainty about the object of your wrath: "... somewhat absurd ..." " ... probably best ignored ..."
You are a mighty troll. JB
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines