在 2021-04-13星期二的 11:18 +0300，Matti Pulkkinen写道：
ti, 2021-04-13 kello 11:39 +0800, Qiyu Yan kirjoitti:
I think it's not due to a broken configuration, maybe a broken NTP server is specified? Can you diff those two configurations?
Sure:
1,5d0 < # These servers were defined in the installation:
"defined in the installation": this means the list of servers is specifyed by installer.
< server 49.57.50.46 iburst < server 56.57.46.49 iburst < server 50.51.46.55 iburst < 7c2,3 < # Please consider joining the pool (http://www.pool.ntp.org/join.html).
# Please consider joining the pool
(https://www.pool.ntp.org/join.html).
pool 2.fedora.pool.ntp.org iburst
As you see, the difference is only in server/pool settings.
IIRC dnf will give you a message during upgrading. And configuration file change may be too frequent that setting a mailing list will not be that helpful.
Ah, I use Gnome Software for updates most of the time, so I wouldn't see messages output by dnf.
After all, if you don't touch those configurations, rpm will upgrade them like its doing with other files, even when they are marked as %config(noreplace).
I have never touched this config file. I didn't even know it existed before yesterday.
I see, seems that those ntp server is specified during Fedora installation, and the server choosed gets broken for some reason. The update didn't break anything, problem is from the 3 servers.
-- Terveisin / Regards, Matti Pulkkinen _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en- US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproje ct.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure