On 01/27/2017 04:04 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 01/27/2017 03:55 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Thanks. The versions I'd seen before didn't involve containers but I'll
> take a look.
I might be wrong, but my understanding is that if you're using
namespacing, you've created a container. The level of
"containerization" depends on which (and how many) namespaces are involved.
Sure, of a type. It's probably a semantic game and different people
would argue that their definition of a container is the "right" one.
When you namespace a network you've actually given yourself a new
network stack, free to modify as you wish. I don't remember the syntax
but I believe there are ways to share pieces of the different stacks in
addition to simply networking between them.