On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 4:21 AM Samuel Sieb <samuel(a)sieb.net> wrote:
On 5/23/19 3:43 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> dnf seems to have convinced itself that the cache is
> perfectly up to date no matter how old it is.
>
> I now always do the two command sequence:
>
> dnf makecache
> dnf update
>
> Less overhead than starting from scratch with "clean all".
Can't you just use "--refresh"?
Nether one of those suggestions gets around the problem I seem to have:
garry@ifr$ sudo dnf makecache;sudo dnf upgrade
Fedora 30 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 1.3 kB/s | 542 B 00:00
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 51 kB/s | 16 kB 00:00
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 84 kB/s | 89 kB 00:01
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates'
Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates'
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 50 kB/s | 16 kB 00:00
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 2.5 kB/s | 108 kB 00:43
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates'
Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates'
garry@ifr$ sudo dnf --refresh upgrade
Fedora 30 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 2.0 kB/s | 542 B 00:00
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 130 kB/s | 17 kB 00:00
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 89 kB/s | 101 kB 00:01
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates'
Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates'
garry@ifr$
The only way I found is to clean all. :-(
--
Garry Williams