Hello,
I wish to thank Michael for his help and patience in understanding the issue.
It was a bit stressing, but finally done.
It seems to indicate that the upgrade from 20 to 22 may not be
without risk.
My understanding is that the dependency failures which where more or less acceptable
with yum update, now prevent the update with dnf. The key point is
that there is not real complain or straight aware.
Thank again every body.
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 2:06 PM
From: "Michael Schwendt" <mschwendt(a)gmail.com>
To: users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:55:47 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > Is it the same when you run "dnf distro-sync"?
> Error: package directfb-1.6.2-3.fc19.i686 requires libmng.so.1, but none of the
providers can be installed.
> package pdftk-1.44-11.fc19.i686 requires itext(x86-32) >= 2.1.7-6, but none of
the providers can be installed
>
I told you before that these do not exist anymore and have been
retired _after_ Fedora 19. You *cannot* keep them if they cause dep breakage:
dnf remove directfb pdftk
dnf distro-sync
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-compilerpro-common-192-13.1-5.noarch
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-compilerpro-devel-192-13.1-5.i486
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-compilerpro-vars-192-13.1-5.noarch
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-compilerproc-192-13.1-5.i486
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by
intel-compilerproc-common-192-13.1-5.noarch
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-compilerproc-devel-192-13.1-5.i486
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-compilerprof-192-13.1-5.i486
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by
intel-compilerprof-common-192-13.1-5.noarch
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-compilerprof-devel-192-13.1-5.i486
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-idb-192-13.0-5.i486
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-idb-common-192-13.0-5.noarch
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-idbcdt-192-13.0-5.noarch
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-ipp-192-7.1-1.i486
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-ipp-common-192-7.1-1.noarch
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-ipp-devel-192-7.1-1.i486
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-mkl-192-11.0-5.i486
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-mkl-common-192-11.0-5.noarch
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-mkl-devel-192-11.0-5.i486
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-openmp-192-13.1-5.i486
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-openmp-devel-192-13.1-5.i486
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by
intel-sourcechecker-common-192-13.1-5.noarch
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-sourcechecker-devel-192-13.1-5.i486
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-tbb-192-4.1-4.noarch
> nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-tbb-devel-192-4.1-4.noarch
These are not from Fedora, are they?
You may need to deal with them, too, as long as they cause dependency
problems.
> > dnf repoquery --duplicated
>
> kernel-PAE-0:3.19.8-100.fc20.i686
> kernel-PAE-0:4.0.4-301.fc22.i686
> kernel-PAE-devel-0:3.19.8-100.fc20.i686
> kernel-PAE-devel-0:4.0.4-301.fc22.i686
> kernel-PAE-devel-0:4.0.8-300.fc22.i686
> kernel-PAE-devel-0:4.1.2-200.fc22.i686
> kernel-PAE-modules-extra-0:3.19.8-100.fc20.i686
> kernel-PAE-modules-extra-0:4.0.4-301.fc22.i686
Well, okay for now, cleaning up wouldn't hurt but normally three kernels are kept
automatically only anyway.
--
users mailing list
users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct:
http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away:
http://ask.fedoraproject.org