On 02/01/2015 11:03 AM, poma wrote:
On 01.02.2015 13:13, g wrote:
On 02/01/2015 04:03 AM, poma wrote:
On 01.02.2015 08:59, g wrote:
<<<<>>>> <<<>>>
Is not it enough to paste the URL in the message, without these complications with attachments?
to what attachments do you refer?
if i have a short attachment, 30 or so lines or less, i attach it.
if i have what i consider a large attachment, a binary file, or a graphic file, i store it on a file/graphic server and supply link.
for sure, there are many who do not do such.
just like there is a great many who do not 'chop dead wood' or reply interspersed.
You want to say there are many for which it is so difficult to c/p URL? :)
T4DS! ;-)