On 30/09/2010 01:21, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
Simon Andrews<simon.andrews(a)bbsrc.ac.uk> writes:
> Does anyone know how to either make this buffer smaller, or get rid of
> it all together so the scp can accruately report on its progress?
Why not cut to the chase and run scp to the remote server. TCP will do
a wonderful job of filling your pipe, but not too much.
I'd love to, but I don't control the remote end of the connection and
the only access I have is via an NFS mount.