El jue, 31-01-2013 a las 16:46 +0100, Ralf Corsepius escribió:
On 01/31/2013 04:44 AM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 01/27/2013 06:15 PM, Lailah wrote:
El vie, 25-01-2013 a las 22:40 +0100, Frantisek Hanzlik escribió:
Joe Zeff wrote:
On 01/25/2013 12:46 PM, James Freer wrote:
LOL - good reply! I must admit i do get fed up with the twin names. In the Precise version... it was very much IMprecise. Just too many bugs now to be worth using.
It often seems to me that they're too concerned about making their names cute for my taste, but I don't use it myself and keep my opinion to myself for the most. Now, alas, it's beginning to look like Fedora's going down that path instead of marketing itself as a serious distro for people who are more interested in how it works than in what it's called. Alas, from what I can see, unless I'm active as a Fedora dev (My programming skills rusted away decades ago.) the only input I have to the process is making suggestions. None of us "mere users" have a vote.
I'd guess, it's people being dissatisfied with what they are used to, now being on a "quest for the better".
That said, from what I've heard and read, Ubuntu is in a similar crisis as Fedora. What is Gnome3 in Fedora seems to be Unity in Ubuntu (users turning away), what's the anaconda-disaster in F18 seems to be a general stability in Ubuntu 12.10.
Of what stability are you talking about? In Ubuntu I couldn't find it. And Unity is worse than Gnome 3.
Just my experience Lailah