I went to bed w/o sending this, sorry.
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 01:05, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 01:49:25PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 27 December 2004 11:46, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 03:27:58PM +0100, Thomas Skybakmoen
wrote:
Will it be part of next Fedora or updated from 2.6.9 in 3? I want to se this apart of RHEL 4 since it has quite a bugfix list and some new hardware and bsd runlevels- wich I hope can be active.
There's a merge to 2.6.10 already in CVS. I'll do a build sometime in the next few days for rawhide. FC2/FC3 will stick on 2.6.9 for a while, whilst the rough edges of 2.6.10 have been polished off.
Dave
Pay attention to samba things
I wonder if thats the missing part of the security hole fix that we carried in the -ac patch on which our 2.6.9 kernels were based. It'll likely go out with 2.6.10-acX when I get around to building it anyway, so if that is the case, we'll pick that bit back up.
, and to amanda things in 2.6.10 Dave,
That I hadn't heard about. Make sure upstream (linux-kernel) hears about these problems too. Unheard problems go unfixed.
Dave
Humm, cancel my thoughts that amanda might be ok, I am in the middle of the run, and amstatus says the estimates are missing for this machine, and I have 2 amandad's showing in an htop report, one with the telltale Z label in its status column. So I've missed 2 backups in a row on this box. Damn!