Greshko wrote:
> I think I found the problem. Comparing packages installed on this
> problem machine with others, I noticed that grubby was not
> installed. After installing it and then re-installing the kernel,
> I find the kernel in /boot where it belongs.
>
> Evidently, something isn't checking dependencies sufficiently. I
> saw no error messages indicating anything was missing.
If that turns out to be the case, and if things on that machine used
to work, it would be interesting to know if/when grubby was removed.
Too long ago to still be in my /var/log/dnf* logs. Evidently, some time
after kernel 4.14.11-300.fc27.x86_64 as that was the last one properly
placed in /boot.
Also, if it fails with grubby out it sounds like a very good
bugzilla.
True.
--
Dave Close