On Dec 8, 2013, at 7:20 PM, Chris Murphy lists@colorremedies.com wrote:
But also unfortunate timing, in that there haven't been significantly better alternatives to FAT32 that address resilience, volume size, and file size limitations.
Oops, other than NTFS.
I don't know what the licensing terms are for NTFS vs exFAT, maybe there's some meaningful difference. But I wonder why so many media devices fall for paying for exFAT, which has significantly less resilience than FAT32, when NTFS is a viable cross platform option.
Chris Murphy