On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:52:21PM -0800, Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 22:23 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> The above sounds as if ATrpms is a use-alone repo, while it's
> fedora.us that chose to live inside walls :(
> (Max, I know you didn't mean it that way, but it may be read so :)
I totally understand.
Well, I might phrase it as "ATrpms and fedora.us did not come to an
agreement about conflicts and naming." :-)
Well, it's worse than that, there wasn't any attempt to do so, since
this is against the still current fedora.us' menifesto. :(
But you're still right -- I didn't mean to shine any bad
you at all, Axel. I really appreciate all the work you do; I use
your packages on a *lot* of my systems.
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net