Re: Continuing dnf weirdness

[Samuel Sieb]

On 11/28/2016 10:41 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 11/27/2016 08:40 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Might be worth getting the debugging info and reporting a bug
> >
> > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/wiki/Bug-Reporting
>
> Or not:
>
> Note: these bugs will have default priority set to low as it's in 95%
> not a DNF bug and wastes only time of DNF developers.

Why do you think that?  This is definitely a dnf bug.  But in this case, 
there's no need to report it as it has already been fixed in a future 
version.

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]/...

"
afaik these are weak dependencies, that are not installed (by policy),
dnf 2.0 reports them without the confusing "conflicts"
"