On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Ian Pilcher <arequipeno(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> Taking note that 'removed functionality' is not the same as 'has not
> yet been added back', what functionality do you need that has been
> removed from KDE 4.x?
If it hadn't been removed, it wouldn't need adding back.
Well just needs adding, not adding back. They started the code base
fresh as far as I understand... which means it hasn't been removed.
Proper dual-head support is the omission that affects me the most
right
now. This is an area in which KDE 3.5 is far ahead of GNOME. OTOH, I
find KDE 4 to be completely unusable on a dual-head setup.
I thought dual head was mostly an X issue.
--
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
(
www.pembo13.com )