Yes, but again the US cant enforce its laws against other countries.
it is not the world govt/world police, and about time they woke up smelt
the damned coffee and realised that.
The US thinks differently. Its accused for example of simply removing
people from other countries to interrogate or torture. The Microsoft v
ATT case if you bother to read it is relevant because Red Hat is based in
the USA (as are many of the contributors).
> In addition a US citizen providing the URL of the livna
repository is
> committing an offence (The 2600 magazine case)
I thought the US had a thing called the ammendement free speach or some
thing, I guess this does not extend to typed speach :)
Nope - common misunderstanding - political speech not arbitary speech. So
your right to object is protected not your right to give the URL
law so I dont really care too much for it, but it seems reasonable
that
if threatened they could very easily be disolved in US and move to a more
legally sane and realistic country.
If you move it and it is doing things not legal in the US then US people
can't contribute.
I guess what they say about the US is true "everybody sues
everybody" :)
Yep.