hello,
Sorry, but the file is huge even after compression.
It has been through the moderator!
How can I help?
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 12:29 PM
From: "Michael Schwendt" <mschwendt(a)gmail.com>
To: users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:20:13 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > > xorg-x11-drv-ati-7.2.0-3.20131101git3b38701.fc20.i686
> > > xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse-13.0.0-6.fc20.i686
> > > xorg-x11-drv-synaptics-1.7.7-2.fc20.i686
> > > xorg-x11-drv-fbdev-0.4.3-10.fc20.i686
> > >
> > > None of them has been updated!!
> >
> > Didn't you say you upgraded from F20 to F22? How did you do that?
>
> YES
fedup --device /dev/sr0 --product=nonproduct
yum update
dnf update
_HOW_ exactly? With a tool like fedup?
> > On Run-level 3:
> >
> > dnf update
> Dependencies resolved.
> Nothing to do.
> Complete!
Have you had a look at "rpm -qa --last" yet? What does it tell?
You can redirect the output to a file or a pipe, such as
rpm -qa --last > output.txt
rpm -qa --last|less
and show it.
> > or:
> > dnf distro-sync
> Last metadata expiration check performed 1:03:22 ago on Wed Jul 29 11:16:10 2015.
> Error: package directfb-1.6.2-3.fc19.i686 requires libmng.so.1, but none of the
providers can be installed.
> package pdftk-1.44-11.fc19.i686 requires itext(x86-32) >= 2.1.7-6, but none of
the providers can be installed
directfb has been retired after Fedora 19:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/directfb.git/plain/dead.package
pdftk has been retired after Fedora 19, too:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/pdftk.git/plain/dead.package
It seems you haven't cleaned up your installation for a very long time.
There have been tools to do that. Even "yum list extras" has been popular.
"dnf list extras" also exists.
> > Also verify "dnf repolist" and /etc/fedora-release so that
you're
> > really using Fedora 22 repos.
Did you ignore this step deliberately?
--
users mailing list
users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct:
http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away:
http://ask.fedoraproject.org