Hi Richard, you appear to be replying to Reindl, While occasionally informative he is predisposed to be aggressive in his responses, I find it easier to filter out his mails and limit my replys to other posters.
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> wrote:
Am 30.03.2013 04:51, schrieb Richard Vickery:
> Those with much more experience in the group and Linux will tell you that this version is no longer supported, and
> that you should download the current one if you need help. It sounds rather cold when they say it, but they've
> answered these questions too often, about one a day, and we may be under pressure to put out the next product.
you do not need to be snappy
* the 6 months release cycle is not new
* everybody who installs a OS should have enough brain to consider the life-cycle for his usage
so no, ZERO understanding for chosing the wrong distribution and ZERO
understanding for try to install a outdated OS on a new computer
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
I'm just offering my understanding of the cycles, Reindl. Perhaps I should have prefaced my contribution as such, but that is not grounds for calling it ZERO. Calling my contribution ZERO indicates that I took a class on understanding the development cycle, in which your ZERO would be self-directed, or directed at Red Hat or Fedora, because you didn't teach the concepts properly, but there is no such course, so why bash me when I am just here to contribute and learn what I can. Did I not start the piece with a suggestive beginning that I may be wrong and those like yourself with vastly superior knowledge would clear it up?