On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 18:01 -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 23:54 -0600, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
>
>> CentOS is taking a distribution created via someone else's hard work
>> and rebranding it as their own. They're essentially relying on Red
>> Hat Software, Inc., for all their distribution and release
>> engineering. I don't care for that.
>>
> Chris, this is not accurate: I understood that Centos is providing RHEL
> type of distributions for platforms not supported by RH. I believe that
> Sun Sparc fits in this category as well as the power pc architecture
ppc32 fits this category. RHEL offers a ppc64 version. We are running it
on a cluster here. CentOS also offers an Alpha version in this category.
CentOS does overlap RHEL in i386, x86_64, ia64. CentOS offers s390. I
thought RH did as well, but I don't see it in RHN channels.
----
CentOS 4 i386 provides i586 support whereas RHEL 4 does not.
I don't know about s390.
Craig