I find amusing that when I check a package in the Dnf list also packages installed from UnitedRpms are listed as installed from System!!!! Is it right?? I suppose no
Antonio Montagnani
Linux Fedora 24 (Workstation) inviato da Gmail
2016-06-22 7:43 GMT+02:00 Samuel Sieb samuel@sieb.net:
On 06/21/2016 10:19 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/22/16 13:15, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/21/2016 10:04 PM, Antonio M wrote:
a silly question, how do you understand that a package is signed in any repo?? apart from the warning of dnf, of course....
That would be the primary way. Otherwise, if you have rpmdevtools
installed, you can download the rpm and run rpmdev-checksig on it. That's what I used to check some rpms from rpmfusion to determine that they aren't signed.
Or you could run rpm -K rpmfile
This shows the output of a signed rpm
[root@meimei ~]# rpm -K aime-8.20160504-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm aime-8.20160504-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm: rsa sha1 (md5) pgp md5 OK
This shows the output of a non-signed rpm
[egreshko@acer ~]$ rpm -K libmpg123-1.22.4-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm libmpg123-1.22.4-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Oh, that's right, you can check it with rpm and I have used that.
However, rpmdev-checksig will give you a bit more info: python /bin/rpmdev-checksig nss-3.21.0-1.1.fc23.i686.rpm nss-3.21.0-1.1.fc23.i686.rpm: RSA/SHA256 - 34ec9cba - < fedora-23-primary@fedoraproject.org> python /bin/rpmdev-checksig a52dec-0.7.4-19.fc24.x86_64.rpm a52dec-0.7.4-19.fc24.x86_64.rpm: MD5 - None - <None>
You currently have to run it with python directly because there's a bug where the #! line has python3, but then it throws an exception. If you run it with python2, it works.
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org