On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 18:36 -0500, Gilboa Davara wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 20:03:52 +0200, Gilboa Davara gilboad@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 12:05 -0400, Chris Snook wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
...
My question: are there rules for the fedora email traffic saying: do not use signatures?
No. Proper use of PKI (such as GPG signatures) is worth a few bytes. Anyone who desperately cares about this can choose to receive mail in daily digest format, which saves far more in headers than would be consumed even if everyone on the list used GPG.
-- Chris
... All nice and dandy, but it would have been nice if anyone would have been able to give me -one- solid reason why he/she needs to sign his/her messages - when they are being posted in a high-volume public ML. (Geek factor not included)
Non-repudiation.
Yey. You managed to send a message that looks like it was sent by me. I'm shocked. ... We are talking about Fedora-users, not CVS-traffic@kernel.org...
- Gilboa