On 05/17/11 18:07, g wrote:
On 05/17/2011 11:44 PM, JD wrote: <>
You call youtube a credible publication?
yes/no.
they do have all different ways of cracking wep, wpa, and wpa2 that are mentioned in this thread.
just a few from my bookmarks, which where easy to find via a little google time;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdJuXtjgIrA&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG9i2VPY_LE&NR=1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lNqqryPBNU&NR=1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3P8l-PsvYak&NR=1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qP1BOZqrp5g&feature=related
along with a few non youtube;
http://hackerwhacker.com/ http://whacker2.hackerwhacker.com/ http://wi-foo.com/ http://www.linux-wireless.com/Sniffers/
all of which goes to show, if you want to spend a little time to find out how to hack wlan/wifi, spend a little time on google.
Well, I hate to disappoint anyone, but until I see a credible security researchers/professors show in a scientific publication that they were able to crack wpa2-psk/AES using PC's and in reasonable time (say a few days), then I would believe it. Youtube is no source of truth.