The flatpak message that I described is no longer appearing.    My "sudo flatpak update" is back to normal.

For those of you brave enough or curious enough to try Rawhide, it is now on kernel

5.8.0-0.rc1.     So far so good on my install.    I bet there are a whole lot of GNU/Linux users that do not know the specific differences between Fedora Rawhide and OpenSUSE Tumbleweed.    I hope to be able to learn that topic and explain it to less-savvy GNU/Linux users what the hoopla is all about - at least from my perspective - as a user and not a developer or packager or tester.     I like them both, but trying to focus on learning the very basics of Rawhide.   I haven't really used Tumbleweed in almost a year though.    Supposedly OpenSUSE has a version more cutting-edge than Tumbleweed.    I plan to look into that someday.     For those of you who have never used Rawhide, when you run "sudo dnf update," the packages are sometimes the git-version.   Many of the packages are labelled in their filename and version something like:     "LibRaw.x86_64      0.20-0.beta1.fc33.1"

and are usually in one of two repositories:    Rawhide and Anaconda.     Feel free to correct me on all this.     I have been advised numerous times that I should not be using Rawhide, evening though I have been using it as my daily-driver and only operating system for almost a year.     One alleged reason, is that debugging programs are running, which hinder performance.

I had hopes of building my first AMD computer this week, but the stress from all the virus hysteria and civil unrest where I am has taken a toll on me.    Anybody out there using the

ASUS Prime X570-Pro with Fedora Workstation on hardware ?

David Locklear

Arcola, Texas USA