Re: today's authconfig update triggered an SELinux warning
Quote:
Joe Smith wrote:
SELinux is preventing /sbin/rpc.statd (rpcd_t) "search" to
(sysctl_fs_t).
From /var/log/messages:
...
Aug 1 09:42:56 duros yum: Updated: authconfig.i386 5.3.15-1.fc7
Aug 1 09:42:58 duros rpc.statd[2014]: Caught signal 15,
un-registering
and exiting.
Aug 1 09:42:59 duros rpc.statd[5279]: Version 1.1.0 Starting
Aug 1 09:43:02 duros sm-notify[5282]: sm-notify running as root.
chown
/var/lib/nfs/sm to choose different user
Aug 1 09:43:02 duros Backgrounding to notify hosts...
Aug 1 09:43:02 duros yum: Updated: nfs-utils.i386 1:1.1.0-1.fc7
Aug 1 09:43:03 duros yum: Updated: authconfig-gtk.i386 5.3.15-1.fc7
Aug 1 09:43:04 duros setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing
/usr/sbin/sm-notify (rpcd_t) "search" to (sysctl_fs_t).
For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l
498c64ce-3b7a-4009-be3c-ce4989e007b3
Aug 1 09:43:04 duros setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing
/sbin/rpc.statd (rpcd_t) "search" to (sysctl_fs_t). For
complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l
498c64ce-3b7a-4009-be3c-ce4989e007b3
...
* What does this message mean?
Usually I can make some sense of SELinux' inscrutable gibberish
(I kid,
I kid), but this one is new to me. My guess would be a directory
access
of some kind--to what?
* Why am I running rpc.statd?
I thought that was for NFS, which I'm not using, although I do
have
nfs-utils installed for some reason.
Rpm tells me that nothing else requires nfs-utils, is there any
reason
not to simply remove it? Authconfig appears to want rpc.statd running
at
least. Maybe I don't need authconfig either.
Any clues appreciated.
Links:
------
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250368
--
This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal https://fcp.surfsite.org
https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=190601&t...
If you think, this is spam, please report this to webmaster(a)fcp.surfsite.org and/or blame
andre(a)bwh.harvard.edu.