Re: FC3: kernel-i586 vs. i686

[Erich Noll]

Hi Guys,

thanks for the reponses.  I think I'm going to bite the bullet
and

rpm -Uvh --force kernel-2.6.10-1.737_FC3.i686.rpm

Worst case is I have to rescue or rebuild this machine.

One last question, though:  someone mentioned that I might have
avoided this predicament had I used yum or up2date instead of rpm. 
Do yum and/or up2date perform the same/similar function as 
rpm?  I might have used yum or up2date for this but I guess I 
thought they performed a different function, i.e. go out to an update
site on the network and pull down more current rpm packages than 
are currently installed on the machine.  I came from RHL8 to FC3 and
have never done any work with other than rpm for loading software.

TIA

Erich

-----Original Message-----
From: "ne..." 
Sent: Jan 12, 2005 8:34 AM
To: For users of Fedora Core releases 
Subject: Re: FC3: kernel-i586 vs. i686

On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:42:32 -0500 (EST), Matthew Saltzman
 wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 08:48:39PM -0600, Erich Noll wrote:
> > > rpm -Uv  kernel-2.6.10-1.737_FC3.i686.rpm
> >
> > Don't do this.  Always rpm -i kernel rpm's, as using -U can
> > really break things badly if something goes wrong.
>
> This problem is a bit different than usual, as the packages have the same
> release/version numbers.

No it is not. rpm  -ivh --replacepkgs  --replacefiles are the options
to be used.
> But this doesn't really help him out of his jam...
>
> This is exactly the moment (and almost the only moment) to use "rpm
> --force".  Boot to an older kernel (you do have an older kernel installed,
> don't you?), then "rpm -Uvh --force kernel-2.6.10-1.737_FC3.i686.rpm".
> Then reboot to the updated kernel.

How is the person going to keep the old working kernel when you tell
them to use rpm -Uvh --force???
rpm -Uvh wipes out every other kernel on the system and leaves you
with a kernel that you do not know works. And as for 'force',  this is
very dangerous practice if you do not know what is going on. Please
refrain from advising anyone to use this. I have detailed much better
options to use in this case.

N.Emile...