On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 13:08:08 -0700, "Wolfgang S. Rupprecht" wolfgang.rupprecht+gnus200905@gmail.com wrote:
As for the man-in-the-middle attack, I'd imagine the biggest usage case is an eavesdropped-in-the-middle and not someone that was able to break the data stream and insert themselves. Having an encrypted channel with a slightly nebulous endpoint is still better than having an unencrypted channel.
For average Joes, the most common problem is going to be that their machine is compromized. Extra security of https over http for them is barely a blip.