Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:20:13 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > xorg-x11-drv-ati-7.2.0-3.20131101git3b38701.fc20.i686
> > xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse-13.0.0-6.fc20.i686
> > xorg-x11-drv-synaptics-1.7.7-2.fc20.i686
> > xorg-x11-drv-fbdev-0.4.3-10.fc20.i686
> >
> > None of them has been updated!!
>
> Didn't you say you upgraded from F20 to F22? How did you do that?
YES
_HOW_ exactly? With a tool like fedup?
> On Run-level 3:
>
> dnf update
Dependencies resolved.
Nothing to do.
Complete!
Have you had a look at "rpm -qa --last" yet? What does it tell?
You can redirect the output to a file or a pipe, such as
rpm -qa --last > output.txt
rpm -qa --last|less
and show it.
> or:
> dnf distro-sync
Last metadata expiration check performed 1:03:22 ago on Wed Jul 29 11:16:10 2015.
Error: package directfb-1.6.2-3.fc19.i686 requires libmng.so.1, but none of the providers
can be installed.
package pdftk-1.44-11.fc19.i686 requires itext(x86-32) >= 2.1.7-6, but none of the
providers can be installed
directfb has been retired after Fedora 19:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/directfb.git/plain/dead.package
pdftk has been retired after Fedora 19, too:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/pdftk.git/plain/dead.package
It seems you haven't cleaned up your installation for a very long time.
There have been tools to do that. Even "yum list extras" has been popular.
"dnf list extras" also exists.
> Also verify "dnf repolist" and /etc/fedora-release so
that you're
> really using Fedora 22 repos.
Did you ignore this step deliberately?