First of all, supporting multiple init systems is not something a distro wants to do.
It would involve forcing package maintainers to support them when getting enough package maintainers is a problem already.
The alternative is to create a respin with another init system and its own builds of any software using systemd. A big task.
And besides... Systemd is quite awesome. Especially for servers. play with cgroups, btrfs and selinux directly in the service file and you can have services running in your very own containers.
Setting up my first new service using a cf
Sendt fra min Sony Xperia™-smarttelefon
---- Frantisek Hanzlik skrev ----
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> HI
>
> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
>
> Rahul, I'm not sure what you're talking about, sorry for my narrow
> english knowledge.
> Despite of that, although I know that systemd fans talk how is its
> documentations exhaustive (best/ideal/...), it isn't truth
>
>
> I disagree with your perspective. There is plenty of documentation
> including tutorials, man pages, guide style documentation etc
>
> Scroll down
>
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/
>
> If you are missing something specific, feel free to file a bug report or
> RFE and reply with that link here.
>
> Rahul
Rahul, thanks to Your recommendation. But for wider angle, this isn't
as so significant. I want a stable system on which I can rely on -
and it now block systemd piece. And as I see for last 4 years of its
evolving, it is still totally buggy thing. I want alternative, as I
said before.
--
Franta Hanzlik
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org