Re: FC4 Pine replacement?

On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 05:16:47PM -0500, Devon Harding wrote:
> Mutt seems better to me.

Now that I have joined others in recommending mutt as a replacement
to pine let me share two problems with mutt:
1. It does not respect the standard that says in a reply everything
after: <CR> -- <CR>
will be deleted in the reply.

2. It it somewhat clumsy to use ipop and imap with mutt.
Otherwise mutt is simpler than pine to use in my opinion.