Re: dangling symlinks and upgrades (was "invisible application after upgrade").

[home user]

On 4/12/21 1:47 PM, Andras Simon wrote:
> 2021-04-12 19:12 UTC+02:00, home user :
> [... snip ...]
> > What good, valid purpose is there for a
> > package to have a dangling symlink?  Or maybe "hunspell" needs a little
> > clean-up?
>
> Probably no and yes. But it's not just hunspell. Far from it!

I was assuming that hunspell was just one example.