Re: fedpkg

[Patrick Dupre]

This information is probably missing:

/usr/lib/rpm/sepdebugcrcfix: Updated 4 CRC32s, 0 CRC32s did match.
12830 blocks
+ '[' '%{buildarch}' = noarch ']'
+ QA_CHECK_RPATHS=1
+ case "${QA_CHECK_RPATHS:-}" in
+ /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths
*******************************************************************************
*
* WARNING: 'check-rpaths' detected a broken RPATH and will cause 'rpmbuild'
*          to fail. To ignore these errors, you can set the '$QA_RPATHS'
*          environment variable which is a bitmask allowing the values
*          below. The current value of QA_RPATHS is 0x0000.
*
*    0x0001 ... standard RPATHs (e.g. /usr/lib); such RPATHs are a minor
*               issue but are introducing redundant searchpaths without
*               providing a benefit. They can also cause errors in multilib
*               environments.
*    0x0002 ... invalid RPATHs; these are RPATHs which are neither absolute
*               nor relative filenames and can therefore be a SECURITY risk
*    0x0004 ... insecure RPATHs; these are relative RPATHs which are a
*               SECURITY risk
*    0x0008 ... the special '$ORIGIN' RPATHs are appearing after other
*               RPATHs; this is just a minor issue but usually unwanted
*    0x0010 ... the RPATH is empty; there is no reason for such RPATHs
*               and they cause unneeded work while loading libraries
*    0x0020 ... an RPATH references '..' of an absolute path; this will break
*               the functionality when the path before '..' is a symlink
*
*
* Examples:
* - to ignore standard and empty RPATHs, execute 'rpmbuild' like
*   $ QA_RPATHS=$(( 0x0001|0x0010 )) rpmbuild my-package.src.rpm
* - to check existing files, set $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and execute check-rpaths like
*   $ RPM_BUILD_ROOT=<top-dir> /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths
*
*******************************************************************************
ERROR   0001: file '/usr/bin/gsl-histogram' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
ERROR   0001: file '/usr/bin/gsl-randist' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rVEtxu (%install)
> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2021 at 11:35 PM
> From: "Patrick Dupre" 
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: fedpkg
>
> This what I have done.
>
> extrated the gsl.spec from gsl-2.7.tgz
> edited it to set the version (2.7)
> run rpmbuild -bb gsl.spec
> It started to work, but finally stop with
> Examples:
> to ignore standard and empty RPATHs, execute 'rpmbuild' like
> $ QA_RPATHS=$(( 0x0001|0x0010 )) rpmbuild my-package.src.rpm
> to check existing files, set $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and execute check-rpaths like
> $ RPM_BUILD_ROOT=<top-dir> /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths
>
> ERROR   0001: file '/usr/bin/gsl-histogram' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
> ERROR   0001: file '/usr/bin/gsl-randist' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rVEtxu (%install)
>
> RPM build errors:
>     Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rVEtxu (%install)
> > > https://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/gsl-latest.tgz (gsl-2.7)
> > > > I thought that fedpkg works with a clone of the git repo for a fedora package.
> > > > Is that what you are doing?
> >
> > That isn't going to work.  You need the extra files from the repo to use
> > fedpkg.  A possibly easier method would be to get the current source
> > file (dnf download --source gsl), install it as your user, edit things
> > as necessary and use rpmbuild to create a new rpm.
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list -- [e-mail]
> > To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
> users mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure