Re: Blocking Spam

[Todd Zullinger]

> I'll try to file this bug so that the Fedora packages can get fixed.
> Ideally it'd get corrected upstream, but I'm not going to file a bug
> there without investing more time trying to figure out why they're
> intentionally working against rpm's dep checking (and I don't have
> the time to do that now).

Added to BZ #193100[1].  Justin Mason, one of the SA authors replied
to that bug to say they're aware of the issue and are indeed thinking
of splitting sa-update into a separate rpm in their packages.  So one
way or another this should get resolved for the Fedora packages as
well.

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/193100