Re: Is there an officially Fedora supported replacement for,>,> the old rc.local? - still an issue

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Wed, 2022-07-20 at 09:57 -0600, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 7/20/22 09:30, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I don't know how you draw that conclusion from what is merely a
> > reminiscence. I use vi because I'm familiar with it. I've also used
> > emacs extensively and like it. There are plenty of alternatives and
> > no-
> > one is being forced to use any of them. I think the Fedora
> > Workstation
> > default is now nano, for what it's worth.
>
> I draw that conclusion from reading many posts here and elsewhere
> from 
> Linux newbies using vi because (and possibly only because) whatever 
> walkthroughs they're trying to follow specify vi, instead of just a
> text editor.

None of that has anything to do with my comment.

poc