On 07/19/2010 05:51 PM, David wrote:
On 7/19/2010 7:41 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:53:51 -0700, Michael Milesmmamiga6@gmail.com wrote:
I have been waiting to see if a kmod comes available and there seems to be the wrong one published by RPMfusion.
Fedora doesn't produce the kmod. You really should be asking about this on the RPMfusion mailiing lists.
This is true, but to the extent that some people can't use the recent kernel until a working video driver is available, it is a Fedora issue. Updates which have security implications really shouldn't have to run in R/L 3 as text only. I don't need 3D accelerated anythings to run a few simple xterms and load monitoring, but not having X at all is an upgrade stopper. I'm running radeon, but more than a few systems which ran well on FC9 need to use VESA modes or even a laptop a VNC. The support for ATI and Nvidia hardware only a few years old is spotty at best.
Good suggestion, though, he won't get any help here.
Obviously the previous kernel worked correct? Why not use that one?
I am using the previous kernel.
I just like to keep up and it is a update I would like to know why the kmod is for a driver that does not exist. 195.36.31-2 is the driver and the kmod for this driver and new kernel 195.36.31-1 which ends with the wrong number Even the kmod for the previous kernel is mismatched and ends with -1 instead of -2
Michael