On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 10:34 -0500, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
On 5/17/06, Lyvim Xaphir knightmerc@yahoo.com wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 16:15 -0500, Russell Golden wrote:
yes, and thank God they made an option in win9x to keep everything in the same window. it's stupid to have everything in separate windows. it's just clutter
Exactly, because of user demand. New window behavior as opposed to tab or pane setups is retrograde evolution.
How about some user demand for flexibility of choice? The "open in a broswer window" is not acceptable. I want the *folder* to open *in the same window*, not in a browswer window. How about some user demand for the GNOME developers to stop screwing with fundamental user interface design every single release?
Bingo. My sentiments exactly. Couldn't have said it better.
I used to be of the opinion that GNOME was "the one" -- both technically superior to KDE (it is) and philosophically superior (now I'm doubtful). GNOME is rapidly losing my respect as it's become less and less easy to use (ironically) because I can't make it do anything other than what's in The Vision(tm) of whomever is making these design decisions.
Right on. There's alot of this disconnect with Gnome "designers" and their constituency, which for some reason they don't seem to ask for advice. (???) I would even go so far as to say that this requires a large amount of fascism on the part of the "designers"; since in fact this is not about user choice, it's about "designer" choice. That smacks of a dictatorship, not a democracy; there's more of ulcer than understanding about it.
Linus is probably right, I should switch to KDE.
I kind of tend to trust Linus Torvalds too. ;) And he's definitely right.
If there was ever a man that believed in freedom of choice, it's LBT. Both in proprietary and free software arenas. Free software without freedom of choice is still no freedom. You should never let "free software" ideology take away your freedom of choice. Linus understands that.
-- Chris
LX