Re: Ubuntu founder doesn't "get" enterprise Linux

[Martin Marques]

Aaron Konstam escribió:
> I thought when RHEL started there was a matter of some its binaries not
> being distributable because they were proprietary. Then Centos was RHEL
> minus service and minus the proprietary binaries. Is that not still
> true? Just asking.

Yes, it's true.

{CentOS} = {RHEL} - {Service} - {proprietary}

BTW, Les said nobody developed extra things for RHEL, which is not true. 
Just look a Dag and Dries rpms repository. Those are "newer desktop apps 
into the stable kernel/libs from RHEL" as was quoted.