i guess also relevant for users and not only devs we are in production from now on, god bless rpmbuild :-)
please catch all package-specific RFE's here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019390
history: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319901#c108 ________________________________________________
nss-softokn (implicit also Firefox/Thunderbird in Fedora) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019244
nss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019245
httpd: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019251
dovecot: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019253
postfix: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019254
openssh: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019256
dbmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019259
libssh2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019333
kde-baseapps (Konqueror): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019337 ________________________________________________
TLS with Apache rebuild verified:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Reindl Harald h.reindl@thelounge.net wrote:
i guess also relevant for users and not only devs we are in production from now on, god bless rpmbuild :-)
please catch all package-specific RFE's here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019390
history: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319901#c108 ________________________________________________
nss-softokn (implicit also Firefox/Thunderbird in Fedora) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019244
nss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019245
httpd: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019251
dovecot: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019253
postfix: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019254
openssh: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019256
dbmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019259
libssh2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019333
kde-baseapps (Konqueror): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019337 ________________________________________________
TLS with Apache rebuild verified:
sounds good,
I think now we can have bitcoin in fedora right ?
------------
Itamar Reis Peixoto
El 2013-10-16 22:51, Itamar Reis Peixoto escribió:
sounds good,
I think now we can have bitcoin in fedora right ?
I'm working on a bitcoin package, I hope to submit it soon.
pardon my ignorance. Is ECDHE at all related to Dual_EC_DRBG or are they different animals? I tried to look it up in internet but could not find (or may be did not understand :) ) any definite answer. Just starting to learn about this stuff.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Juan Orti Alcaine juan.orti@miceliux.comwrote:
El 2013-10-16 22:51, Itamar Reis Peixoto escribió:
sounds good,
I think now we can have bitcoin in fedora right ?
I'm working on a bitcoin package, I hope to submit it soon.
-- Juan Orti GPG Key: DEEBD08B - https://www.miceliux.com/~**juan/pubkey.aschttps://www.miceliux.com/~juan/pubkey.asc Blog: https://apuntesderoot.**wordpress.com/https://apuntesderoot.wordpress.com/
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/usershttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-**of-conducthttp://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/**Mailing_list_guidelineshttp://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 08:19:04AM +0200, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
El 2013-10-16 22:51, Itamar Reis Peixoto escribió:
sounds good,
I think now we can have bitcoin in fedora right ?
I'm working on a bitcoin package, I hope to submit it soon.
There is already a community repo with bitcoin packages:
http://linux.ringingliberty.com/bitcoin/
El 2013-10-17 17:57, Suvayu Ali escribió:
There is already a community repo with bitcoin packages:
I've based my work on that: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020292